From a09db4ce4c10454427e738ff6f2a6162ee276e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Kurfer <peter.kurfer@fh-rosenheim.de> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 22:30:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Added disclaimer --- README.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 7823a66..3f152b8 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ +_This is an assignment to the class [Programmieren 3](https://hsro-inf-prg3.github.io) at the [University of Applied Sciences Rosenheim](http://www.fh-rosenheim.de)._ + # Assignment 5: Generic bounds In this assignment we want to deal with generic bounds. @@ -39,4 +41,4 @@ Last but not least we'll look at the PECS (**P**roducer **E**extends **C**onsume  1. Modify the _map_ method in the _SimpleList_ interface according to the PECS principle -2. Implement the utility method _splitBedByColor_ in a utility class _PlantBedUtility_ <br>_Side note:_ why should the class _PlantBedUtility_ be `abstract` and have a `private` constructor?<br>_Remark:_ the given UML for the utility method does not include any generic bound but you **need** some (PECS!) because the compilere won't let you implement the method as described in the UML! \ No newline at end of file +2. Implement the utility method _splitBedByColor_ in a utility class _PlantBedUtility_ <br>_Side note:_ why should the class _PlantBedUtility_ be `abstract` and have a `private` constructor?<br>_Remark:_ the given UML for the utility method does not include any generic bound but you **need** some (PECS!) because the compilere won't let you implement the method as described in the UML! -- GitLab